Difference between revisions of "File talk:Siege of Constantinople.jpg"
m |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As far as I understand things, even though the painting itself may be considered "public domain", reproductions of these works may be copyrighted. IMHO someone should contact the site owner for permission or to understand the use {{User:FrJohn/sig}} | As far as I understand things, even though the painting itself may be considered "public domain", reproductions of these works may be copyrighted. IMHO someone should contact the site owner for permission or to understand the use {{User:FrJohn/sig}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | : This image is from [[Wikipedia:Image:Siege of Constantinople.jpg|Wikipedia]] and also found on [[Commons:Image:Siege of Constantinople.jpg|Wikimedia Commons]], which notes that "The two-dimensional work of art depicted in this image is in the public domain worldwide due to the date of death of its author, or due to its date of publication. Thus, this reproduction of the work is also in the public domain. This applies to reproductions created in the United States (see Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.), in Germany, and in many other countries." —[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 08:39, August 12, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Thanks for looking into this! I do think we should give Wikipedia as the main source instead of the other sites. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:27, August 13, 2006
As far as I understand things, even though the painting itself may be considered "public domain", reproductions of these works may be copyrighted. IMHO someone should contact the site owner for permission or to understand the use User:FrJohn/sig
- This image is from Wikipedia and also found on Wikimedia Commons, which notes that "The two-dimensional work of art depicted in this image is in the public domain worldwide due to the date of death of its author, or due to its date of publication. Thus, this reproduction of the work is also in the public domain. This applies to reproductions created in the United States (see Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.), in Germany, and in many other countries." —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 08:39, August 12, 2006 (CDT)
- Thanks for looking into this! I do think we should give Wikipedia as the main source instead of the other sites. Fr. John
